Which factors could have affected the conflicting results of these studies? Check all that apply. physical condition of study participants bias of broadcasters diet of participants length of study education level of study participants genetic differences in study participants age of study researchers

Respuesta :

Options A, C, D, and F are all correct! Have a good day:)

Study in which people who took fish oil supplements did not reduce their risk of heart attack. Two months later, a different broadcaster reports the results of another study claiming that taking fish oil daily decreases the risk of a heart attack by nearly 50 percent. So physical condition of study participants, length of study education,  diet of participants, length of study,  genetic differences in study participants.  Thus, the correct option is A, C, D and E.

What is a genetics?

Genetics is the scientific study of genes and heredity of how certain qualities or traits are passed from parents to offspring as a result of changes in DNA sequence.

Genes play an important role in measuring physical traits as how we look like. Genes carry information which makes a person who is he and what he look like and the body characteristics such as curly or straight hair, long or short legs, even how he might smile or laugh.

Physical condition of study participants depends on what type of body that have, many participants might have lean body, or they might suffer from heart problems.

When the researcher conducted the study, it depends how many days the research has been take place, what factors they included while studying about fish oil.

In some participants, the fish oil doesn't effect on participants and didnt reduce any heart problem.

How the participants eat and what kind of diet they include on this the opinion can be biased.

For more information regarding genetics, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/851793

#SPJ2