Respuesta :
Hey there!
Based on how (Elizabeth) react's and talks to this person, it seem's to be more "logic" than anythings else. This seem's to be reasoning on what the person is doing.
To state out some quotes from the passage: we have entirely determined not to marry an absent husband; and that we shall give you no certain reply until we shall have seen your person.
The quote that was brought out that is listed above is what I wanted to explain. It seems like (Elizabeth) is pointing something out for this person to help this person in what she is going to do. She is giving "logic" reasoning to this person.
This is why I believe that your correct answer would be "logic".
Hope this helps.
~Jurgen
Based on how (Elizabeth) react's and talks to this person, it seem's to be more "logic" than anythings else. This seem's to be reasoning on what the person is doing.
To state out some quotes from the passage: we have entirely determined not to marry an absent husband; and that we shall give you no certain reply until we shall have seen your person.
The quote that was brought out that is listed above is what I wanted to explain. It seems like (Elizabeth) is pointing something out for this person to help this person in what she is going to do. She is giving "logic" reasoning to this person.
This is why I believe that your correct answer would be "logic".
Hope this helps.
~Jurgen
Logic
Further Explanation:
Eric XIV was the king of Sweden and he ruled Sweden for eight years. He also ruled Estonia and he was always regarded as an intelligent and skilled ruler. During the initial years of his reign only, he started to show signs of mental instability and it eventually led to insanity.
Based on how Elizabeth reacts and speaks with the person from the above statement in the question, they seem to be more ‘logical’ than any other options from the question. This seems to be reasoning about what the person is doing to state out some of the quotes in the text. It states that the person is determined not to marry a husband absent and that will give no answer until you have seen that person. It seems that Elizabeth points out towards something of this individual to help this individual what he was going to do and she is giving ‘logical’ reasoning to this individual.
Learn More:
1. In Furman v. Georgia (1972), the supreme court ruled in William Furman's favor, saying that Georgia had
https://brainly.com/question/2816742
2. Which would most likely fall under the original jurisdiction of the supreme court?
https://brainly.com/question/2203653
Answer Details:
Grade: High School
Chapter: Erik of Sweden
Subject: English
Keywords: English, Erik of Sweden, Logical, Elizabeth, Determined, Husband, Absent, Statement, answer.
