Answer:
Opponents of a revenue bill may prefer an open rule rather than a closed rule because an open rule allows for more opportunities to propose amendments and debate on the bill. With an open rule, legislators have the flexibility to introduce amendments that could potentially alter or weaken the bill, making it less likely to pass in its original form. This provides opponents of the bill with the chance to influence its content and potentially derail its progress through the legislative process. In contrast, a closed rule restricts the number and types of amendments that can be proposed, limiting the ability of opponents to alter the bill's content or challenge its provisions. Therefore, opponents of a revenue bill may seek an open rule as a strategic maneuver to increase their chances of defeating or modifying the bill to align more closely with their interests.
