Respuesta :
- The landowner charged the sharecropper more than was necessary, treating him unfairly.
- The sharecropper must continue working until he pays off this debt, which is why the system is so challenging to change.
Sharecropping was so unfair, why?
- Sharecropping was a bad concept since it increased the amount of debt that the poor owed the plantation owners.
- Because sharecroppers eventually owed the plantation owners so much money that they had to give them all of the money they made from cotton, sharecropping was comparable to slavery.
What distinguishes sharecropping from slavery?
- Sharecropping is the practice of renting out land to a tenant in exchange for a portion of their harvest.
- Additionally, if a bad year results in no crop, the owner does not suffer a loss in earnings, and the sharecropper owes the owner money.
- The fact that slaves are unable to hold property makes a significant difference.
To learn more about sharecropping visit:
https://brainly.com/question/23573460
#SPJ4
