Determine the reason that each source is unreliable. faulty reasoning omission bias a general report on raising children that is not supported by data arrowRight an article talking only about the benefits of a vegan diet and not potential drawbacks arrowRight a review about a company by an employee that was fired from the company arrowRight

Respuesta :

Answer:

  1. An article talking only about the benefits of a  vegan diet and not potential drawbacks  → Omission.
  2. A review about a company by an employee that  was fired from the company  → Bias
  3. A general report on raising children that is not  supported by data  → Faulty reasoning

Explanation:

An article talking only about the benefits of a vegan diet and not the potential drawbacks is an example of an omission. This is because the author of the article failed to present very important information on the topic covered, which is essential for the reader to understand the topic covered in the article in a comprehensive and complete manner. This type of source is common in articles that want the reader to be convinced about something and therefore omits valuable information that is negative about the subject.

An analysis of a company by an employee who was fired from the company is an example of bias. A bias is characterized as the tendency of an individual to be against or in favor of a given situation or element unfairly, taking into account personal or insufficient factors to determine whether something is good or bad. An employee who was fired will have personal reasons to devalue and complain about a company, without analyzing relevant facts about that company, that is, a fired employee will have a negative bias towards the company.

A general report on raising children that is not  supported by data is an example of faulty reasoning. This is because it is not correct to draw conclusions about something without data analysis. Data is responsible for allowing individuals to reason correctly and to draw accurate conclusions about something. If data is not presented, reasoning is flawed and impossible to draw correct and accurate conclusions.