Answer:
D
Explanation:
The text repeatedly states the Japanese Americans failed to show any immediate threats which rules out A. Although the Justice says deprivation of rights may be justified, that is not the main point of the text. The Justice does not center around the ability to deprive rights, but focuses more so on if this specific case is justified. This eliminates option B. As for C, the text states rights can be deprived under certain circumstances: "an immediate, imminent, or impending" danger. D perfectly suits the central idea of the text as the Justice consistently outlines the lack of threat coming from the Japanese Americans. One such example is the sentence: "Banishing 'all persons of Japanese ancestry...' clearly does not meet that test."
