For decades, scientists relied on the fossil record and comparative anatomy to assemble evolutionary lineages. Which statement describes a limitation of these methods? (1 point) They are no longer relevant because the fossil record is complete. They can show false relationships between organisms that are not reflected in the DNA. They are not reliable evidence of how the body structures of organisms evolved. They cannot be used to determine when species evolved.

Okay so there is a thing called "convergent evolution" which basically means that different species coming from different evolutionary lines evolve the same traits. It's really easy to mistake convergent evolution for evolutionary similarities. From the fossil record, it's easy to see the bones of one animal and to see that they are similar to another but that doesn't prove that they are related because it's often due to convergent evolution.

tallinn tallinn · Answer 2 · 2022-04-16T10:02:58+02:00

They can offer false relationships between organisms that are not reflected in the DNA. Also, they don't prove they are related due to convergent evolution.

What is DNA?

There is a thing called "convergent evolution" which essentially suggests that additional species coming from different evolutionary strings become the same traits.

It's really easy to misunderstand convergent evolution for evolutionary parallels.

From the fossil record, it's easy to catch the bones of one animal and to see that they are equal to another but that doesn't confirm that they are connected because it's often due to concurrent evolution.

Find more information about DNA here:

https://brainly.com/question/8806489