in the 1957 case Watkins versus us the Supreme Court ruled that Congress has no General authority to expose the Private Affairs of individuals without justification with which aspect of life in the 1950s was this case most closely associated

A) Sputnik and The Space Race
B) the "Jim Crow" South and Civil Rights
C) the "Red Scare" and communist subversion
D) conservative backlash against "Rock and Roll"

Question

13-04-2021
History

contestada

in the 1957 case Watkins versus us the Supreme Court ruled that Congress has no General authority to expose the Private Affairs of individuals without justification with which aspect of life in the 1950s was this case most closely associated

A) Sputnik and The Space Race
B) the "Jim Crow" South and Civil Rights
C) the "Red Scare" and communist subversion
D) conservative backlash against "Rock and Roll"

Respuesta :

Otras preguntas

If a doctor does not believe that certain alternative treatments have medical value, which statement best describes the part of ethics the doctor should follow?

Knowledge of what four aspects is critical to the successful application of a material in an engineering design?

What is the value of X?

Ivano works at a department store selling perfume and make up. She earns 375 per week and 4% commission on her sales. If Ivano's sales for the week were 2513 w

How do I write this without exponents? (a raised to the 2)raised to the 4???? so (a^2)^4

A screw incorporates which other simple machine?

The _______________ has/have the power to declare the actions of the legislative and executives braches unconstitutional. a. supreme court b. federal courts

Which symptom is a result of taking diuretics? nausea diarrhea loss of fluids rapid weight loss

What quality do the paintings of titian possess because of his use of the impasto technique in painting? a. sensuality b. religiosity c. restraint d. piety

HELP Gary won the 100-m dash with a time of 9.87 seconds. His time was 0.93 seconds faster than Brian’s. What was Brian’s time? A. 8.94 seconds B. 10.61 sec

AddisonreEasterIing AddisonreEasterIing · Answer 1 · 2021-04-13T15:50:04+02:00

Answer:

In Watkins case, the United States Supreme Court ruled that the constitution does not render any power to the congress to uncover the privately reserved activities of the individual.

Explanation:

The vocabulary terms most closely related may be as follows:

Watkins was charged for his misdemeanor in failing to answer the questions posed by the members of the congress. Supreme Court urged him to disclose the identity of the individuals whom he recognized to be the advocates of the communist party.

He shunned off answering this question saying that these inquiries were outside the scope for which he was sworn in court.