koraima89sanchez
contestada

A) chaim used an invalid reason to justify the congruence of a pair of sides or angles.

B) chaim only established some of the necessary conditions for a congruence criterion.

C) chaim established all necessary conditions, but then used an inappropriate congruence criterion.

D) chaim used a criterion that does not guarantee congruence.

Plz help​

A chaim used an invalid reason to justify the congruence of a pair of sides or anglesB chaim only established some of the necessary conditions for a congruence class=

Respuesta :

akposevictor

The error Chaim made in his proof is: D. Chaim used a criterion (SSA) that does not guarantee congruence.

What is the Side-side-side Congruence Theorem (SSA)?

The SSA congruence theorem only exist and holds true, only if the congruence non-included angles in both triangles are either obtuse or right angles and have two pairs of congruent sides.

Thus:

The two triangles given have a pair of non-included congruent angles that are less than 90 degrees.

Therefore, the error Chaim made in his proof is: D. Chaim used a criterion (SSA) that does not guarantee congruence.

Learn more about SSA theorem on:

https://brainly.com/question/19258025

Otras preguntas