Answer:
The main principle that was derived under this decision is that the First Amendment also protects opinions from the unpopular people, for the fact that the opinion of the majority is protected already. Although the Nazis may have chosen a jewish community deliberately for their rally, it was however a peaceful rally and hence the state do not have any right to stop them. It also created a distinction between speech and action and protected the wearing of Swastikas as this cannot be banned, since there is a freedom of speech as mandated by the first Amendment. Thus, the court allowed the group to speak out their hatred other than allowing the government dictate for the citizens, what and what not to do.
Explanation:
In Collin v. Smith, the US Supreme Court upheld the First Amendment by ruling that the followers of Nazism should not be denied the free expression of their views. This ruling ensures that there is no muzzling of the rights of citizens to speak out their opinions.
In this case, the Court accords the Nazi Party the right to organize a peaceful rally without government censorship despite its offensive message.
Thus, the Court's ruling affirms the rights of the citizens to freely express their views, thereby emphasizing the importance of the First Amendment over state powers.
Learn more: https://brainly.com/question/903615
