contestada

Keesha says the transformation is a translation, but Teagan says that the transformation is a dilation. Which statement
about the transformation is true?
O Keesha is correct because the shaded rectangle is moved vertically to make the unshaded rectangle.
O Keesha is correct because the shaded rectangle is flipped across a horizontal line.
O Teagan is correct because the unshaded rectangle is smaller than the shaded rectangle.
O Teagan is correct because the unshaded rectangle is turned in a clockwise direction.

Respuesta :

lyssabeckette

Answer:

Ok. I seem to have to say this a lot, but It is hard to answer a question about a graph, if it doesn't come with a graph to answer it with. So next time, please include a picture or a small screenshot of the graph in your question. Thank you.

C. Teagan is correct because the unshaded rectangle is smaller than the shaded rectangle

Step-by-step explanation:

I took the test thank you very much and the graph you are talking about is down below.

Have a great rest of your day, and I am sorry I was late, but I knew the answer, and hopefully it will help someone out there. \

\(^u^\)

Ver imagen lyssabeckette
olayemiolakunle65

Answer:

Teagan is correct because the unshaded rectangle is smaller than the shaded rectangle.

Step-by-step explanation:

Translation in geometry describes a function that moves an object a certain distance without any alteration to the object in any way. Every point of the object must be moved in the same direction and through the same distance. While dilation is a transformation that produces an image of a given object but of different size. It requires a scale factor and a fixed point in the plane called the center of the dilation.

Therefore comparing the two shapes, the transformation is dilation. So, Teagan is correct because the unshaded rectangle is smaller than the shaded rectangle.