Answer:
Transitive property of equality is not a justification for the proof.
Step-by-step explanation:
We draw a right angle ΔACB. CD is perpendicular to AB.
Let AC = a , BC = b , AB = c and CD = h
Now in ΔABC and ΔACD
∠C = ∠D and ∠A = ∠A
from AA similarity postulate
ΔABC similar to ΔACD.
Hence,
[tex]\frac{c}{a}[/tex] = [tex]\frac{a}{x}[/tex]
[tex]a^{2}[/tex] = c × x ·····················(1)
Now in ΔABC and ΔCBD
∠C = ∠D and ∠B = ∠B
from AA similarity postulates
ΔABC similar to ΔCBD
Hence,
[tex]\frac{c}{b} = \frac{b}{y}[/tex]
[tex]b^{2}[/tex] = c × y······················(2)
Add equation (1) and (2)
[tex]a^{2}[/tex] + [tex]b^{2}[/tex] = cx + cy
[tex]a^{2}[/tex] + [tex]b^{2}[/tex] = c(x+y)
[tex]a^{2}[/tex] + [tex]b^{2}[/tex] = [tex]c^{2}[/tex] [because x+y=c]
Transitive property is not useful for this proof.