4. How does the author's discussion of Bethel School
District v. Fraser contribute to the development of
ideas in the text (Paragraphs 22-23)?

A. It suggests that the results of the Tinker case didn't
actually ensure the protection of students' free speech
in school.

B. It emphasizes the idea that the Supreme Court not only
interprets the Bill of Rights to protect natural rights,
but also to determine the extent of them.

C. It shows how the Supreme Court's reinterpretations of
"the Bill of Rights primarily limit rights, rather than
protect them.

D. It highlights how confusing the Bill of Rights is, and how
the Supreme Court is the only group of people qualified
to interpret it.